Validity and reliability of the Persian version of Violence Risk Screening?10 Instrument V Risk 10 in admitted patients to the psychiatric ward

Zahra Mostafavian, Golkoo Hosseini, Elham Masoudi

Abstract


Background: Violence Risk Screening Tool?10 (V?Risk?10) is one of the few instruments available for violence risk assessment in patients with a psychiatric diagnosis. The present study aimed to validate the Persian version of this instrument in patients admitted to the psychiatric ward. Materials and Methods: Eighty patients referred to a psychiatric hospital were enrolled in this cross?sectional methodological study. In the initial phase, seven senior psychiatry residents rated 20 cases independently at the time of their admission and total scale and subscale reliability were examined. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the inter?rater reliability. After initial confirmation of V?RISK?10 reliability, a senior psychiatry resident assessed 80 patients with V?RISK?10 in the emergency room. The incident of violent behaviors was recorded during the patients’ admission period. The receiver operator characteristics curve (ROC?curve) analysis was used to measure the predictive accuracy of the instrument. The convergent validity was assessed by comparing V?RISK?10 scores between the three risk categories and the three  utcome recommendations according to clinicians’ overall clinical judgment. Results: A Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.99 for the total scale. During the research period, 47.5% of patients demonstrated various degrees of aggression and violent behavior. The ROC area under  he curve was 0.89 (P < 0.001) with 87% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 72% positive predictive value, and 85% negative predictive value at the cutoff point of 8.5. Conclusion: Results indicate that the Persian version of V?Risk?10 is a reliable and valid screening tool for violence risk in patients
who are admitted into psychiatric wards.

Keywords


Inpatient psychiatry, reliability, screening, validity, violence risk assessment

Full Text:

PDF