Role of electrophysiological study in patients with syncope and bundle branch block
Abstract
Background:The finding of bundle branch block (BBB) in patients with syncope suggests that paroxysmal atrioventricular block (AVB) or ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) may be the cause of syncope. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy have been recommended to perform electrophysiological study (EPS) for confi rming main cause of syncope. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the role of EPS in patients with syncope and BBB. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 133 patients (mean age 63 ± 13.8 years) with past history of syncope and BBB from April 2002 to December 2010 who referred to Arrhythmia clinic in two tertiary care centers. All patients were under EPS on admission time.The frequency distributions of AVB and VT in patients were determined. Results: Left bundle branch block was diagnosed in 184 (82.1%) patients. 133 of them had preserved left
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ?45%) that in 91 (68.4%) of those, EPS fi nding was normal. In 41 (30.8%) patients AVB was reported.In 2 (1.5%) patients VT and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia were seen. Coronary artery disease was more common in patients with AVB and abnormal EPS fi nding (P = 0.02). Conclusion:Ventricular tachyarrhythmia was a rare electrophysiological finding in those with syncope, bifascicular block, and preserved LVEF. Considering cost-effect benefit, pacemaker or implantable loop recorder implantation is suggested; however, EPS may not be necessary to perform before permanent pacemaker implantation.
Key words: Atrioventricular block, electrophysiological study, left bundle branch block, permanent pacemaker implantation,
syncope, ventricular tachyarrhythmia
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ?45%) that in 91 (68.4%) of those, EPS fi nding was normal. In 41 (30.8%) patients AVB was reported.In 2 (1.5%) patients VT and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia were seen. Coronary artery disease was more common in patients with AVB and abnormal EPS fi nding (P = 0.02). Conclusion:Ventricular tachyarrhythmia was a rare electrophysiological finding in those with syncope, bifascicular block, and preserved LVEF. Considering cost-effect benefit, pacemaker or implantable loop recorder implantation is suggested; however, EPS may not be necessary to perform before permanent pacemaker implantation.
Key words: Atrioventricular block, electrophysiological study, left bundle branch block, permanent pacemaker implantation,
syncope, ventricular tachyarrhythmia