<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">
<Articles><Article><Journal><PublisherName></PublisherName><JournalTitle>Journal of Research in Medical Sciences</JournalTitle><Issn>1735-1995</Issn><Volume>8</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2003</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>28</Day></PubDate></Journal><title locale="en_US">EVALUATION OF 754 SURGICALLY TREATED LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION</title><FirstPage>2950</FirstPage><LastPage>2950</LastPage><Language>EN</Language><AuthorList><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Neurosurgery Department School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health services, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation></Author></AuthorList><History><PubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2003</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>28</Day></PubDate><PubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2009</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>04</Day></PubDate></History><abstract locale="en_US">&lt;font&gt;&lt;font color="#555555"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma"&gt;This article reports the outcome of a series of patients who received surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation during a 5 year period in Kashani hospital. Three operative procedures were used for discectomy: unilateral interlaminar bilateral interlaminar and bilateral laminectomy. An objective method of assessing outcome that would not depend on the procedures, the prolo functional-economic outcome rating scale used to evaluate patients. Most patients had good outcome. The patient with non-industrial injuries had better had good outcome. The patient with non-industrial injuries had better outcome. The prolo scale appears to be a useful tool for comparing different procedures more objectively and for comparing the outcome across series.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</abstract><web_url>http://jrms.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jrms/article/view/2950</web_url></Article></Articles>
