<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">
<Articles><Article><Journal><PublisherName></PublisherName><JournalTitle>Journal of Research in Medical Sciences</JournalTitle><Issn>1735-1995</Issn><Volume>22</Volume><Issue>11</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2017</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>03</Day></PubDate></Journal><title locale="en_US">Epidemiology of Q fever in Iran: A systematic review and meta?analysis for estimating serological and molecular prevalence</title><FirstPage>10722</FirstPage><LastPage>10722</LastPage><Language>EN</Language><AuthorList><Author/><Author/><Author/><Author/><Author/></AuthorList><History><PubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2017</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></PubDate></History><abstract locale="en_US">&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;Background: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;Q fever is endemic in Iran, thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta?analysis on epidemiology of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;Coxiella&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;table class="NormalTable"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="550"&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;burnetii &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;among humans and animals in Iran. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;A systematic search was performed to identify all articles&lt;br /&gt;reporting &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;C. burnetii &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;prevalence in Iranian humans or animals, published from January 2000 to January 2015. Data from articles were extracted, and a pooled estimate of prevalence with corresponding 95% confdence interval (CI) was calculated using random e?ect method. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;Results: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;In this review, 27 papers were identifed. Te pooled seroprevalence of Q fever in animals was 27% (CI 95%: 23%–32%). Te prevalence was 33% (CI 95%: 22%–45%) in goats, 27% (CI 95%: 21%–32%) in sheep, and 17% (CI 95%: 5%–28%) in cattle. Te bacterial DNA was detected in 5% (95% CI: 3%–9%) of milk samples, and it was higher in cattle (10%; 95% CI: 6%–16%) than sheep (2%; 95% CI: 0–7%) and goats (4%; 95% CI:  0–12%). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;C. burnetii &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;DNA or its antibody has been frequently detected among ruminants. Since these animals can transmit the infection to humans, Q fever could be a potential health problem in Iran.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;" /&gt;</abstract><web_url>http://jrms.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jrms/article/view/10722</web_url><pdf_url>http://jrms.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jrms/article/download/10722/5573</pdf_url></Article></Articles>
