Journal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-1995228201705051068510685EN20170722<span class="fontstyle0">Background: </span><span class="fontstyle2">Conveying information to patients on how to use medications at the dispensing sessions and retention of this information by the  patients is essential to the good pharmaceutical care. Te aim of our study was to examine the comprehensibility of the selected three potentially  usable pictograms by five groups of subjects who had different levels of  literacy in both before and after mini educational sessions. </span><span class="fontstyle0">Materials and Methods: </span><span class="fontstyle2">Nine experienced pharmacists selected three potentially usable pictograms in Isfahan pharmacies: Pictograms D through F representing respectively: “do not take medication during pregnancy,” “keep medication<br />in the refrigerator,” and “take medication with plenty of water.” Ten,  raduate students of two major universities (Groups 1 and 2), low-literate  nd illiterate individuals (Groups 3 and 4), and walk – in patients in the  harmacies affiliated to the Isfahan School of Pharmacy (Group 5) were  sked about the comprehensibility of these pictograms before and after mini-education sessions. Te American National Standard Institute and International Organization for Standardization standards were used for comparisons. </span><span class="fontstyle0">Results: </span><span class="fontstyle2">In the pre-follow-up period, D and E pictograms were most understandable (87.4%, 87.2%). In the post-follow-up, E and D<br />pictograms were understood most (98.0%, 95.3%), followed by F (92.9%). Among the improvements measured in post-follow-up, pictogram F showed the biggest improvement (</span><span class="fontstyle3">P </span><span class="fontstyle2">= 0.0). </span><span class="fontstyle0">Conclusion: </span><span class="fontstyle2">Pictograms depicting the use of medications during pregnancy (D) and storing medication in the refrigerator (E) was easier to understand by our study population. Te  groups with the high level of literacy interpreted the pictograms better than those with lower levels of literacy.</span> <br style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;" />http://jrms.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jrms/article/view/10685http://jrms.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jrms/article/download/10685/5476